<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jonti.org &#187; Intelligent Society</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jonti.org/category/intelligent-society/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jonti.org</link>
	<description>Building connections between ideas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 06:09:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Meta Attractiveness</title>
		<link>http://jonti.org/intelligent-society/meta-attractiveness</link>
		<comments>http://jonti.org/intelligent-society/meta-attractiveness#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 03:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jonti</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intelligent Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attractiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meta attractiveness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonti.org/?p=204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How to evaluate your date's attractiveness from the perspective of your genes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the dating and mating aspect of life, most people put a great deal of weight on a person&#8217;s physical attractiveness.  It is my contention that what people should do instead is consider a person&#8217;s meta-attractiveness.  The point of being physically attractive is largely to lure mates with whom to have children and thus propagate your genes.  But humankind has now evolved to such a rarefied level of intelligence that we have realized that this is the point of physical attractiveness, and we can now think one step ahead.  If your desire is to propagate your genes, then wouldn&#8217;t you be even more successful in the evolutionary game if you were to propagate your children&#8217;s genes? Ha!</p>
<p>Here is how it works. Let&#8217;s say you&#8217;re a man and you find physically attractive women sexually arousing. But you have rarefied intelligence, so you are aware that your genes have programmed you to find physically attractive women sexually arousing so that you will propagate your genes.<br />
<div id="attachment_280" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://flickr.com/photos/pierre_tourigny/146532556/"><img class="size-medium wp-image-280" title="attractive" src="http://jonti.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/attractive-300x196.jpg" alt="Each woman is a composite of about 30 faces.  By Pierre Tourigny.  Creative Commons license." width="300" height="196" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Each woman is a composite of about 30 faces. By Pierre Tourigny. Creative Commons license.</p></div></p>
<p>  You think a step ahead and realize that your genes would be even better off if you had physically attractive children, so you determine to mate not with the most physically attractive woman, but the woman with whom you would have the most physically attractive children.</p>
<p>For example, let&#8217;s say you have a big nose and you know that medium-sized noses are the most attractive.  You should choose to make with a woman who has a small nose in order to have children who will have medium-sized noses.  If you just blindly go for the more attractive medium-sized-nose woman, you will end up with children who have less attractive medium-large noses, which will reduce their mating prospects.</p>
<p>The real trick is to find a mate with whom you are equally likely to have highly attractive children of either sex.  Of course those with even more rarefied intelligence will select mates with an eye toward children with meta- rather than physical attractiveness&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jonti.org/intelligent-society/meta-attractiveness/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The benefits of Amtrak</title>
		<link>http://jonti.org/intelligent-society/the-benefits-of-amtrak</link>
		<comments>http://jonti.org/intelligent-society/the-benefits-of-amtrak#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 04:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jonti</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intelligent Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amtrak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonti.org/?p=109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I needed to travel from New York to Pittsburgh and back recently and I decided to take Amtrak instead of flying.  An Amtrak ticket costs $126 round trip.  Flying would have cost me about $250.  I made the decision to use Amtrak in order to save money, but I was surprised at how much I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-110" title="amtrak" src="http://jonti.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/amtrak-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></p>
<p>I needed to travel from New York to Pittsburgh and back recently and I decided to take Amtrak instead of flying.  An Amtrak ticket costs $126 round trip.  Flying would have cost me about $250.  I made the decision to use Amtrak in order to save money, but I was surprised at how much I enjoyed my trip.</p>
<p>Here are some of the reasons I would choose to travel by train again:</p>
<ol>
<li>It is much easier to get to the train station than to the airport.  This is true not only in New York, where Penn station is right in the middle of Manhattan, but also in Pittsburgh and many other cities such as Philadelphia and Washington DC.  I saved about 30 minutes of travel time by not having to go to the airport.  Also, the subway in New York goes directly to Penn Station, so there are no extra costs involving taxis or the AirTran.
<p /></li>
<li>I arrived at the train station 10 minutes before my train was to depart.  No security.  No check in.  Just get on the train and get out your book.
<p /></li>
<li>You can put your tray table down immediately.
<p /></li>
<li>There are plugs for your laptop, cell phone charger, etc.
<p /></li>
<li>Massive amounts of leg room.
<p /></li>
<li>A dining car with a cafe and also tables where you can spread out a bit and do some work if you want to.
<p /></li>
<li>Half the cost of flying.
<p /></li>
<li>You can go to the restroom whenever you want to and you don&#8217;t have to wait for the fasten seat belt sign to turn off.  Also, the restrooms are three times as large as airplane restrooms.
<p /></li>
<li>The environment on the train is conducive to thinking, reading, and writing.  I felt like I used my time on the train very well in terms of getting things done.  I hardly ever feel that way when I fly.
<p /></li>
<li>The whole experience feels vastly less stressful than flying. It is almost relaxing to take a train ride.
<p /></li>
</ol>
<p>The down side, of course, is that the trip takes longer than flying.  The flight from New York to Pittsburgh is 90 minutes, while the train ride is 9 hours.  The true time required for flying, however, must include the time spent getting to the airport, the time at the airport (you are supposed to arrive an hour or more before your flight) and the greater likelihood that inclement weather will delay the flight. In my estimation, flying from New York to Pittsburgh would take about 4 hours in total. In addition, only 90 minutes, at most, will be useful work time.</p>
<p>The insight for me was that time spent travelling does not have to be wasted time.  Comparing 4 hours flying vs. 9 hours by train makes it seems like travelling by train wastes 5 hours.  In reality you should compare 4 hours flying vs. 9 hours confined to a comfortable space with your laptop, books, papers, and no distractions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jonti.org/intelligent-society/the-benefits-of-amtrak/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
